PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRT vs. TIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FRTTIP
YTD Return14.19%2.17%
1Y Return25.54%5.43%
3Y Return (Ann)0.37%-2.44%
5Y Return (Ann)1.29%1.91%
10Y Return (Ann)2.17%2.01%
Sharpe Ratio1.641.26
Sortino Ratio2.371.87
Omega Ratio1.291.22
Calmar Ratio1.030.50
Martin Ratio8.915.70
Ulcer Index3.42%1.10%
Daily Std Dev18.62%5.01%
Max Drawdown-57.42%-14.56%
Current Drawdown-8.72%-7.43%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between FRT and TIP is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FRT vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 2.17%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.05%
2.06%
FRT
TIP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRT vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRT, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRT, currently valued at 8.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.91
TIP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TIP, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TIP, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TIP, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TIP, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TIP, currently valued at 5.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.70

FRT vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and TIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.64
1.26
FRT
TIP

Dividends

FRT vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than TIP's 2.41% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.83%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%2.98%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
2.41%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%1.67%1.15%

Drawdowns

FRT vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and TIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.72%
-7.43%
FRT
TIP

Volatility

FRT vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.31%. This indicates that FRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.01%
1.31%
FRT
TIP