FRT vs. FREL
FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust) is a stock, while FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) is REIT fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. Over the past 10 years, FRT returned 1.39%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for FREL. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FRT vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than FREL's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed FREL with an annualized return of 1.39%, while FREL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.97% annualized return.
FRT
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 6M
- 25.01%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
FREL
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
FRT vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 25.42% | -5.91% | 12.07% | 6.55% | -22.66% | 65.97% | -30.66% | 12.51% | -8.10% | -3.59% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 11.53% | 3.09% | 5.05% | 11.74% | -26.21% | 40.46% | -4.99% | 28.78% | -4.52% | 8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRT and FREL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FRT and FREL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRT vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank
FRT
FREL
FRT vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRT | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 1.35 | +3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 4.23 | +8.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRT vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than FREL's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and FREL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRT | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.42% | -42.61% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -8.45% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.38% | -17.54% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.99% | -34.40% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.47% | -42.61% | -13.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.77% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.77% | -9.91% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.70% | +0.05% |
Volatility
FRT vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) have volatilities of 4.96% and 5.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRT | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 5.15% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 10.21% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 13.84% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 18.90% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 20.72% | +8.75% |
Dividends
FRT vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than FREL's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 3.63% | 4.39% | 2.93% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRT and FREL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FREL has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to FRT (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRT dropped -57.42% vs FREL's -42.61%.
FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRT and FREL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer