FRT vs. ABBV
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FRT or ABBV.
Correlation
The correlation between FRT and ABBV is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FRT vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FRT:
0.53
ABBV:
0.67
FRT:
0.84
ABBV:
0.96
FRT:
1.10
ABBV:
1.15
FRT:
0.38
ABBV:
0.83
FRT:
3.11
ABBV:
2.29
FRT:
3.02%
ABBV:
6.89%
FRT:
17.61%
ABBV:
23.67%
FRT:
-57.42%
ABBV:
-45.09%
FRT:
-12.34%
ABBV:
-15.87%
Fundamentals
FRT:
$9.79B
ABBV:
$309.92B
FRT:
$3.44
ABBV:
$2.88
FRT:
33.24
ABBV:
60.90
FRT:
4.72
ABBV:
0.42
FRT:
$1.18B
ABBV:
$55.53B
FRT:
$712.23M
ABBV:
$42.68B
FRT:
$801.54M
ABBV:
$24.24B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 1.32%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.
FRT
9.67%
-3.26%
10.71%
10.61%
1.20%
1.32%
ABBV
14.73%
2.97%
1.37%
17.21%
18.99%
14.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FRT vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FRT vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than ABBV's 3.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 3.99% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% | 2.47% | 2.98% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.61% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% | 2.54% | 3.03% |
Drawdowns
FRT vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and ABBV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FRT vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is 5.40%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that FRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FRT vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Realty Investment Trust and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities