PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRT vs. ABBV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FRTABBV
YTD Return14.19%13.95%
1Y Return25.54%27.91%
3Y Return (Ann)0.37%17.78%
5Y Return (Ann)1.29%19.02%
10Y Return (Ann)2.17%14.98%
Sharpe Ratio1.641.19
Sortino Ratio2.371.53
Omega Ratio1.291.26
Calmar Ratio1.031.66
Martin Ratio8.915.32
Ulcer Index3.42%5.14%
Daily Std Dev18.62%23.00%
Max Drawdown-57.42%-45.09%
Current Drawdown-8.72%-16.44%

Fundamentals


FRTABBV
Market Cap$9.73B$302.34B
EPS$3.43$2.88
PE Ratio33.1359.41
PEG Ratio4.120.40
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.18B$55.53B
Gross Profit (TTM)$712.23M$42.72B
EBITDA (TTM)$753.93M$26.35B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FRT and ABBV is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FRT vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FRT having a 14.19% return and ABBV slightly lower at 13.95%. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 2.17%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.05%
5.81%
FRT
ABBV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRT vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRT, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRT, currently valued at 8.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.91
ABBV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 5.32, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.32

FRT vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and ABBV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.64
1.19
FRT
ABBV

Dividends

FRT vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than ABBV's 3.64% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.83%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%2.98%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.64%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%2.54%3.03%

Drawdowns

FRT vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and ABBV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.72%
-16.44%
FRT
ABBV

Volatility

FRT vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is 5.01%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 15.46%. This indicates that FRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.01%
15.46%
FRT
ABBV

Financials

FRT vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Realty Investment Trust and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items