FRPH vs. BN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) and Brookfield Corp (BN).

Performance

FRPH vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) and Brookfield Corp (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FRPH vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRPH FRP Holdings, Inc.	-3.99%	-25.60%	-2.58%	16.75%	-6.82%	26.89%	-8.55%	8.26%	3.98%	17.37%
BN Brookfield Corp	-11.65%	20.54%	44.18%	28.60%	-34.80%	49.30%	8.99%	52.68%	-10.65%	33.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FRPH : $415.98M BN : $95.79B
EPS FRPH : $0.24 BN : $0.55
PE Ratio FRPH : 89.86 BN : 73.13
PS Ratio FRPH : 9.80 BN : 1.26
PB Ratio FRPH : 0.97 BN : 2.19
Total Revenue (TTM) FRPH : $42.46M BN : $76.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) FRPH : $27.21M BN : $29.53B
EBITDA (TTM) FRPH : $18.75M BN : $32.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRPH achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FRPH has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 2.22%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.

FRPH

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: -8.60%
• YTD: -3.99%
• 6M: -10.18%
• 1Y: -23.42%
• 3Y*: -8.90%
• 5Y*: -2.30%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

BN

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FRPH vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRPH

FRPH Risk / Return Rank: 9
FRPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FRPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FRPH Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FRPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FRPH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BN

BN Risk / Return Rank: 59
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRPH vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRPH	BN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	0.50	-1.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	0.89	-2.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.12	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	0.81	-1.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.58	2.40	-3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRPH vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRPH Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRPH and BN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRPH	BN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	0.50	-1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.39	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.47	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.30	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between FRPH and BN is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FRPH vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

FRPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRPH FRP Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BN Brookfield Corp	0.62%	0.52%	0.56%	0.70%	1.44%	1.12%	1.55%	1.11%	1.56%	1.29%	1.58%	1.50%

Drawdowns

FRPH vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRPH drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRPH and BN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRPH	BN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.53%	-82.22%	+20.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.43%	-22.05%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.25%	-41.85%	+5.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.97%	-51.42%	-2.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.03%	-17.55%	-17.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-28.61%	+8.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.95%	7.40%	+7.55%

Volatility

FRPH vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) and Brookfield Corp (BN) have volatilities of 9.77% and 9.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRPH	BN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.77%	9.96%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.41%	21.50%	-3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.29%	33.43%	-7.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.10%	30.94%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.42%	30.06%	+1.36%

Financials

FRPH vs. BN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FRP Holdings, Inc. and Brookfield Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FRPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FRP Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.69M and revenue of 10.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

BN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a gross profit of 8.91B and revenue of 21.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

FRPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FRP Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.36M and revenue of 10.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

BN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported an operating income of 8.89B and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.9%.

FRPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FRP Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 662.00K and revenue of 10.78M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

BN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Corp reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 21.18B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.