PortfoliosLab logo
FREL vs. ICF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FREL and ICF is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FREL vs. ICF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FREL:

0.77

ICF:

0.86

Sortino Ratio

FREL:

1.17

ICF:

1.29

Omega Ratio

FREL:

1.16

ICF:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

FREL:

0.58

ICF:

0.65

Martin Ratio

FREL:

2.45

ICF:

2.69

Ulcer Index

FREL:

5.85%

ICF:

5.93%

Daily Std Dev

FREL:

18.16%

ICF:

18.01%

Max Drawdown

FREL:

-42.61%

ICF:

-76.73%

Current Drawdown

FREL:

-13.18%

ICF:

-11.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FREL achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's 3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FREL has underperformed ICF with an annualized return of 5.40%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.68% annualized return.


FREL

YTD

1.12%

1M

-0.59%

6M

-7.19%

1Y

11.78%

3Y*

0.34%

5Y*

6.67%

10Y*

5.40%

ICF

YTD

3.06%

1M

-0.39%

6M

-5.37%

1Y

13.02%

3Y*

0.98%

5Y*

6.92%

10Y*

5.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF

FREL vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FREL vs. ICF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FREL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FREL is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FREL is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FREL is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FREL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FREL is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FREL is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ICF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICF is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICF is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICF is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICF is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICF is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICF is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FREL vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FREL Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the ICF Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FREL and ICF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FREL vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison

FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than ICF's 2.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.50%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%0.00%
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
2.59%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.32%3.30%3.00%

Drawdowns

FREL vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and ICF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FREL vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...