FREL vs. ICF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF).
FREL and ICF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FREL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. It was launched on Feb 2, 2015. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. Both FREL and ICF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FREL or ICF.
Correlation
The correlation between FREL and ICF is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FREL vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FREL:
0.32
ICF:
0.31
FREL:
0.53
ICF:
0.52
FREL:
1.07
ICF:
1.06
FREL:
0.20
ICF:
0.19
FREL:
1.22
ICF:
1.11
FREL:
4.22%
ICF:
4.46%
FREL:
16.12%
ICF:
16.21%
FREL:
-42.61%
ICF:
-76.73%
FREL:
-15.02%
ICF:
-15.70%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FREL having a -1.89% return and ICF slightly higher at -1.81%.
FREL
-1.89%
-5.93%
-0.02%
4.52%
2.17%
N/A
ICF
-1.81%
-5.43%
-0.27%
4.25%
2.41%
4.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FREL vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FREL vs. ICF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FREL
ICF
FREL vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FREL vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than ICF's 2.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.55% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% | 0.00% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.71% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.32% | 3.30% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
FREL vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and ICF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FREL vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) have volatilities of 6.25% and 6.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.