PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDPX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDPX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 11.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.22%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


FRDPX

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.47%
6M
6.08%
YTD
8.00%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
11.22%
ALL TIME*
9.57%

IVV

1D
1.47%
1M
1.72%
6M
9.57%
YTD
11.75%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.33B$3.25B$5.92B

FRDPX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
8.00%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%26.62%16.29%29.83%-5.27%17.33%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.75%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDPX and IVV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2000

0.91

The correlation between FRDPX and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDPX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRDPX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRDPXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.64

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

11.23

-4.42

FRDPX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDPX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRDPX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -51.57%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDPXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.57%

-55.25%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-8.89%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-18.75%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-24.53%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

-33.90%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-10.72%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.08%

-0.26%

Volatility

FRDPX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) is 2.83%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that FRDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDPXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.81%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

10.27%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

12.87%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

17.03%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

18.07%

-0.95%

FRDPX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDPX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.46%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDPX and IVV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to FRDPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDPX dropped -51.57% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDPX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer