FR vs. SH
FR (First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.) is a stock, while SH (ProShares Short S&P500) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%). Over the past 10 years, FR returned 12.22%/yr vs -12.89%/yr for SH. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FR vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FR achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FR has outperformed SH with an annualized return of 12.22%, while SH has yielded a comparatively lower -12.89% annualized return.
FR
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
FR vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 6.39% | 18.17% | -2.01% | 11.91% | -25.37% | 60.33% | 4.24% | 47.37% | -5.61% | 15.50% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FR and SH is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | -0.57 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FR and SH has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.57 to -0.31, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FR vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
FR
SH
FR vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FR | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.77 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | -0.95 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | -1.75 | +10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FR | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | -1.47 | +2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.54 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | -0.72 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.59 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
FR vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FR drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FR and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FR | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.42% | -94.66% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -18.28% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.42% | -38.82% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.95% | -44.53% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.12% | -76.12% | +35.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -94.62% | +88.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.36% | -67.73% | +42.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 9.89% | -6.67% |
Volatility
FR vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that FR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FR | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 2.84% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 8.91% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.61% | 11.80% | +7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 16.85% | +5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 18.01% | +6.34% |
Dividends
FR vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
FR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than SH's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 3.04% | 3.11% | 2.95% | 2.43% | 2.45% | 1.63% | 2.37% | 2.22% | 3.01% | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.30% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FR and SH have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FR dropped -95.42% vs SH's -94.66%.
FR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FR and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer