PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 7.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FPX has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 14.65%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.


FPX

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.02%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
14.65%

IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPX vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
18.28%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%27.03%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX and IWY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.81

The correlation between FPX and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPX vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPX
IWY

Technology

29.8%
54.9%

Industrials

20.0%
4.0%

Healthcare

16.1%
6.6%

Communication Services

7.0%
13.9%

Utilities

6.5%
1.1%

Energy

4.4%
0.0%

Real Estate

4.2%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
11.4%

Basic Materials

3.3%
0.3%

Financial Services

3.0%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.0%

Technology

FPX
29.8%
IWY
54.9%

Industrials

FPX
20.0%
IWY
4.0%

Healthcare

FPX
16.1%
IWY
6.6%

Communication Services

FPX
7.0%
IWY
13.9%

Utilities

FPX
6.5%
IWY
1.1%

Energy

FPX
4.4%
IWY
0.0%

Real Estate

FPX
4.2%
IWY
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FPX
3.5%
IWY
11.4%

Basic Materials

FPX
3.3%
IWY
0.3%

Financial Services

FPX
3.0%
IWY
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

FPX
2.3%
IWY
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPXIWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.61

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

5.26

+5.14

FPX vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPXIWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.77

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.94

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.92

-0.35

Drawdowns

FPX vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.29%

-32.68%

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-16.63%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-23.22%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-32.68%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

-32.68%

-10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.82%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-4.75%

-6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

5.09%

-1.31%

Volatility

FPX vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.69%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

3.69%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

11.65%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.10%

15.54%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.49%

21.48%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

20.97%

+3.31%

FPX vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPX vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than IWY's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.49%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX and IWY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to IWY (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.57% vs 14.65% for FPX. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.

FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.20% for IWY.

IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer