PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPI vs. AGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FPI vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPI achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FPI has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 3.23%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.12% annualized return.


FPI

1D
-0.61%
1M
-7.00%
YTD
1.54%
6M
0.71%
1Y
-9.94%
3Y*
0.20%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
3.23%

AGM

1D
-0.22%
1M
3.99%
YTD
6.32%
6M
4.71%
1Y
0.81%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
22.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPI vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPI
Farmland Partners Inc.
1.54%-14.11%5.66%3.99%6.09%39.70%32.09%53.84%-45.13%-17.84%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
6.32%-7.96%6.08%74.61%-5.83%72.62%-6.60%43.16%-20.38%39.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FPI and AGM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2014

0.26

The correlation between FPI and AGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FPI:

$0.63

AGM:

$24.06

PE Ratio

FPI:

15.43

AGM:

7.61

PEG Ratio

FPI:

0.24

AGM:

0.56

PS Ratio

FPI:

8.64

AGM:

1.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

FPI:

$53.83M

AGM:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FPI:

$42.39M

AGM:

$295.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

FPI:

$36.98M

AGM:

$192.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPI vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPI
FPI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AGM
AGM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPI vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPIAGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.04

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

0.03

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

0.05

-0.90

FPI vs. AGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPI Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPI and AGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPI vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPI drawdown since its inception was -59.77%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPI and AGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPIAGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.77%

-94.63%

+34.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-31.94%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-32.54%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.88%

-32.54%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.44%

-53.30%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.69%

-10.37%

-15.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.62%

-27.84%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.73%

16.97%

-5.24%

Volatility

FPI vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) is 5.41%, while Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that FPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPIAGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

8.60%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

25.29%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.07%

32.09%

-9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.18%

29.92%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

34.53%

+1.13%

Dividends

FPI vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

FPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than AGM's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
3.39%3.42%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%
FPI
Farmland Partners Inc.
4.85%4.54%11.31%3.61%1.85%1.67%2.30%2.95%7.82%5.88%4.57%4.54%

Financials

FPI vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Farmland Partners Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
10.10M
415.96M
(FPI) Total Revenue
(AGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FPI vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Farmland Partners Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
85.5%
0
Portfolio components
FPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Farmland Partners Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.63M and revenue of 10.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.5%.

AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Farmland Partners Inc. reported an operating income of 3.57M and revenue of 10.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Farmland Partners Inc. reported a net income of 640.00K and revenue of 10.10M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 51.83M and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FPI and AGM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGM has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to FPI (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPI dropped -59.77% vs AGM's -94.63%.

AGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPI and AGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer