FPBFX vs. FIVFX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX).

FPBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 1, 1986. FIVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1994.

Performance

FPBFX vs. FIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FPBFX vs. FIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	0.75%	37.15%	9.26%	14.07%	-23.71%	2.28%	32.92%	32.21%	-18.08%	40.06%
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	0.00%	19.54%	8.05%	27.58%	-26.48%	12.14%	22.32%	33.05%	-12.87%	35.81%

Returns By Period

FPBFX

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 34.14%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 5.76%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

FIVFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPBFX vs. FIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPBFX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FIVFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

FPBFX

Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund

FIVFX

Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund

Return for Risk

FPBFX vs. FIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPBFX

FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPBFX vs. FIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPBFX	FIVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPBFX	FIVFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FPBFX and FIVFX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FPBFX vs. FIVFX - Dividend Comparison

FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, less than FIVFX's 10.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	8.13%	8.19%	5.99%	5.36%	8.76%	14.97%	4.45%	0.75%	10.88%	4.36%	2.38%	3.61%
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	10.67%	10.67%	4.19%	0.38%	0.05%	9.08%	1.28%	3.29%	3.00%	2.99%	0.68%	1.57%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FPBFX	FIVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.25%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FPBFX	FIVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.31%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	—	—