PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOVL vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOVL vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOVL

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

VBR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.58%
6M
10.78%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$56.96M$55.85M$67.93M

FOVL vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%7.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
16.70%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and VBR is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FOVL and VBR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FOVL vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FOVL
VBR

Financial Services

44.6%
17.5%

Industrials

12.8%
17.3%

Energy

7.7%
4.3%

Utilities

7.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.2%

Technology

5.0%
10.9%

Healthcare

4.9%
8.4%

Communication Services

4.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.6%
11.1%

Basic Materials

-

5.3%

Financial Services

FOVL
44.6%
VBR
17.5%

Industrials

FOVL
12.8%
VBR
17.3%

Energy

FOVL
7.7%
VBR
4.3%

Utilities

FOVL
7.5%
VBR
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FOVL
5.2%
VBR
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

FOVL
5.0%
VBR
4.2%

Technology

FOVL
5.0%
VBR
10.9%

Healthcare

FOVL
4.9%
VBR
8.4%

Communication Services

FOVL
4.7%
VBR
2.4%

Real Estate

FOVL
2.6%
VBR
11.1%

Basic Materials

FOVL

-

VBR
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOVL vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOVL vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOVLVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

FOVL vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOVL vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOVLVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

Volatility

FOVL vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOVLVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

FOVL vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FOVL vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

FOVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOVL and VBR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FOVL.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for FOVL.

FOVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.05% for VBR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOVL and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer