FOCT vs. GLOV
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF- October (FOCT) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) World Low Vol Plus Equity ETF (GLOV).
FOCT and GLOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FOCT is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Oct 16, 2020. GLOV is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 15, 2022.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FOCT or GLOV.
Correlation
The correlation between FOCT and GLOV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FOCT vs. GLOV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FOCT:
1.04
GLOV:
1.68
FOCT:
1.41
GLOV:
2.30
FOCT:
1.23
GLOV:
1.30
FOCT:
2.06
GLOV:
2.85
FOCT:
9.04
GLOV:
8.24
FOCT:
0.72%
GLOV:
1.96%
FOCT:
6.26%
GLOV:
9.65%
FOCT:
-14.07%
GLOV:
-17.77%
FOCT:
-3.16%
GLOV:
-0.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than GLOV's 5.60% return.
FOCT
0.04%
-2.03%
1.30%
6.12%
N/A
N/A
GLOV
5.60%
1.91%
4.63%
15.38%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOCT vs. GLOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GLOV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FOCT vs. GLOV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FOCT
GLOV
FOCT vs. GLOV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF- October (FOCT) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) World Low Vol Plus Equity ETF (GLOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FOCT vs. GLOV - Dividend Comparison
FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF- October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLOV Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) World Low Vol Plus Equity ETF | 1.66% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
FOCT vs. GLOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum GLOV drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and GLOV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FOCT vs. GLOV - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF- October (FOCT) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) World Low Vol Plus Equity ETF (GLOV) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.