FNWFX vs. MCSIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FNWFX (American Funds New World Fund Class F-3) and MCSIX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - FNWFX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by American Funds, while MCSIX is a Commodities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, FNWFX returned 7.52%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for MCSIX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNWFX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MCSIX.

Performance

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNWFX achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than MCSIX's 16.30% return.

FNWFX

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 19.12%
• 1Y: 36.94%
• 3Y*: 18.74%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: —

MCSIX

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -6.65%
• YTD: 16.30%
• 6M: 16.30%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: 10.85%
• 10Y*: 6.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3	18.20%	28.67%	6.88%	16.24%	-21.77%	5.09%	25.30%	28.02%	-12.00%	25.87%
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	16.30%	18.47%	5.08%	-6.13%	13.40%	27.55%	-0.02%	7.79%	-12.79%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FNWFX and MCSIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between FNWFX and MCSIX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FNWFX vs. MCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNWFX

FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

MCSIX

MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 36
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNWFX	MCSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.50	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	2.00	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.27	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	2.53	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	8.48	+2.71

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the MCSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNWFX and MCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNWFX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum MCSIX drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNWFX and MCSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNWFX	MCSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.40%	-64.20%	+30.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-9.46%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-9.74%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.40%	-37.61%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.46%	+9.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-33.19%	+24.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	2.93%	+0.31%

Volatility

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) at 3.76%. This indicates that FNWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNWFX	MCSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.65%	3.76%	+3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	13.76%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	15.98%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	34.61%	-18.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	26.02%	-9.51%

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNWFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSIX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNWFX vs. MCSIX - Dividend Comparison

FNWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than MCSIX's 13.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3	5.15%	6.09%	4.10%	2.88%	1.33%	7.32%	0.43%	4.04%	2.70%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	13.79%	16.04%	3.30%	2.21%	27.42%	56.01%	0.88%	1.87%	3.50%	3.14%	0.61%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNWFX and MCSIX in my portfolio?

FNWFX and MCSIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNWFX or MCSIX?

FNWFX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to MCSIX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNWFX dropped -33.40% vs MCSIX's -64.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.