PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FNV vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and GLDM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

FNV vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.85%
8.36%
FNV
GLDM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNV:

0.77

GLDM:

2.11

Sortino Ratio

FNV:

1.18

GLDM:

2.76

Omega Ratio

FNV:

1.14

GLDM:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

FNV:

0.58

GLDM:

3.94

Martin Ratio

FNV:

3.16

GLDM:

10.77

Ulcer Index

FNV:

6.65%

GLDM:

2.96%

Daily Std Dev

FNV:

27.11%

GLDM:

15.14%

Max Drawdown

FNV:

-58.76%

GLDM:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

FNV:

-22.36%

GLDM:

-3.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 2.00% return.


FNV

YTD

7.69%

1M

6.00%

6M

-2.85%

1Y

16.86%

5Y*

4.77%

10Y*

9.98%

GLDM

YTD

2.00%

1M

1.09%

6M

8.36%

1Y

30.58%

5Y*

11.39%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNV vs. GLDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNV is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNV is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNV is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNV is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNV is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNV is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLDM is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLDM is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLDM is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLDM is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLDM is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNV vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNV, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.772.11
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNV, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.182.76
The chart of Omega ratio for FNV, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.141.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNV, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.583.94
The chart of Martin ratio for FNV, currently valued at 3.16, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.003.1610.77
FNV
GLDM

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.77
2.11
FNV
GLDM

Dividends

FNV vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
1.14%1.22%1.23%0.94%0.84%0.82%0.72%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%1.59%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FNV vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-22.36%
-3.98%
FNV
GLDM

Volatility

FNV vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 4.56%. This indicates that FNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.81%
4.56%
FNV
GLDM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab