PortfoliosLab logo
FNILX vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNILX and ^SP500TR is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FNILX vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNILX:

0.73

^SP500TR:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

FNILX:

1.16

^SP500TR:

1.14

Omega Ratio

FNILX:

1.17

^SP500TR:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

FNILX:

0.78

^SP500TR:

0.77

Martin Ratio

FNILX:

2.97

^SP500TR:

2.95

Ulcer Index

FNILX:

4.99%

^SP500TR:

4.86%

Daily Std Dev

FNILX:

19.86%

^SP500TR:

19.63%

Max Drawdown

FNILX:

-33.75%

^SP500TR:

-55.25%

Current Drawdown

FNILX:

-3.88%

^SP500TR:

-3.81%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNILX having a 0.67% return and ^SP500TR slightly lower at 0.65%.


FNILX

YTD

0.67%

1M

9.40%

6M

-0.82%

1Y

14.30%

5Y*

17.28%

10Y*

N/A

^SP500TR

YTD

0.65%

1M

9.09%

6M

-0.89%

1Y

13.82%

5Y*

17.37%

10Y*

12.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNILX vs. ^SP500TR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNILX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNILX is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNILX is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNILX is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNILX is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNILX is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNILX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^SP500TR is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNILX vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FNILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNILX and ^SP500TR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

FNILX vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNILX drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, smaller than the maximum ^SP500TR drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNILX and ^SP500TR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FNILX vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) have volatilities of 6.20% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...