PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNIDX vs. VCOBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VCOBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNIDX achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than VCOBX's 0.60% return.


FNIDX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.36%
YTD
11.27%
6M
13.24%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

VCOBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
11.27%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-14.00%12.96%
VCOBX
Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares
0.60%7.73%2.21%6.39%-13.13%-1.51%10.41%9.64%-0.85%2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and VCOBX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.08

Over the past year, FNIDX and VCOBX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. VCOBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VCOBX
VCOBX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VCOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VCOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VCOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNIDXVCOBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.20

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

6.56

+2.57

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VCOBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and VCOBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNIDXVCOBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.57

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.11

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.48

+0.01

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, which is greater than VCOBX's maximum drawdown of -18.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and VCOBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNIDXVCOBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-18.14%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-2.62%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-5.63%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.79%

-18.03%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.25%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-4.18%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.88%

+2.09%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VCOBX) at 1.33%. This indicates that FNIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCOBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNIDXVCOBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

1.33%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

2.66%

+9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

3.68%

+11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

5.78%

+10.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

4.76%

+11.79%

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNIDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VCOBX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNIDX vs. VCOBX - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than VCOBX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.53%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%0.00%
VCOBX
Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares
4.73%4.80%5.04%4.44%3.01%1.23%3.09%3.08%3.10%2.20%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNIDX and VCOBX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNIDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to VCOBX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNIDX dropped -33.17% vs VCOBX's -18.14%.

FNIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNIDX and VCOBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer