FNGU vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FNGU and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both FNGU and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGU or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between FNGU and VOO is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNGU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FNGU:
0.23
VOO:
0.72
FNGU:
1.07
VOO:
1.20
FNGU:
1.14
VOO:
1.18
FNGU:
0.48
VOO:
0.81
FNGU:
1.11
VOO:
3.09
FNGU:
27.01%
VOO:
4.88%
FNGU:
93.34%
VOO:
19.37%
FNGU:
-92.34%
VOO:
-33.99%
FNGU:
-37.57%
VOO:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -25.65% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 1.73% return.
FNGU
-25.65%
41.24%
-9.15%
22.95%
44.42%
N/A
VOO
1.73%
13.04%
2.12%
13.91%
17.57%
12.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGU vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGU vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FNGU
VOO
FNGU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FNGU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.28% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FNGU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FNGU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 24.39% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.49%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...