FNGU vs. NVDL

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -25.65% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's -18.44% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and NVDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FNGU nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than NVDL's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and NVDL.

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) is 10.08%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 21.47%. This indicates that FNGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.