FNGS vs. RBOD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L).
FNGS and RBOD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. RBOD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 19, 2017. Both FNGS and RBOD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGS or RBOD.L.
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and RBOD.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FNGS vs. RBOD.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNGS:
0.86
RBOD.L:
0.23
FNGS:
1.34
RBOD.L:
0.47
FNGS:
1.17
RBOD.L:
1.06
FNGS:
1.04
RBOD.L:
0.22
FNGS:
3.06
RBOD.L:
0.82
FNGS:
9.07%
RBOD.L:
6.81%
FNGS:
32.25%
RBOD.L:
24.11%
FNGS:
-48.98%
RBOD.L:
-44.50%
FNGS:
-10.17%
RBOD.L:
-10.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than RBOD.L's -4.25% return.
FNGS
-3.96%
9.37%
9.65%
31.70%
29.75%
N/A
RBOD.L
-4.25%
3.16%
0.00%
6.69%
12.64%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGS vs. RBOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RBOD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGS vs. RBOD.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FNGS
RBOD.L
FNGS vs. RBOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNGS vs. RBOD.L - Dividend Comparison
FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.79% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. RBOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than RBOD.L's maximum drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and RBOD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNGS vs. RBOD.L - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a higher volatility of 18.48% compared to iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) at 14.16%. This indicates that FNGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.