FNGS vs. QQQX

In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a -6.12% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's -10.72% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FNGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGS and QQQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%.

The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and QQQX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a higher volatility of 18.65% compared to Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 16.15%. This indicates that FNGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.