FNGS vs. QQQX
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX).
FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGS or QQQX.
Performance
FNGS vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a 42.29% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's 17.70% return.
FNGS
42.29%
6.44%
17.27%
49.21%
33.98%
N/A
QQQX
17.70%
2.94%
11.36%
21.20%
9.14%
9.82%
Key characteristics
FNGS | QQQX | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.99 | 1.50 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.57 | 2.07 |
Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.27 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.76 | 1.40 |
Martin Ratio | 8.98 | 7.37 |
Ulcer Index | 5.48% | 2.88% |
Daily Std Dev | 24.73% | 14.15% |
Max Drawdown | -48.98% | -57.25% |
Current Drawdown | -0.90% | -1.60% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and QQQX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGS vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNGS vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison
FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 6.49% | 7.26% | 9.65% | 5.86% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% | 7.07% | 6.79% |
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and QQQX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNGS vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 3.98%. This indicates that FNGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.