FNGS vs. LLY
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY).
FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGS or LLY.
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and LLY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FNGS vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNGS:
0.83
LLY:
-0.06
FNGS:
1.25
LLY:
0.21
FNGS:
1.16
LLY:
1.03
FNGS:
0.94
LLY:
-0.05
FNGS:
2.73
LLY:
-0.11
FNGS:
9.18%
LLY:
12.37%
FNGS:
32.12%
LLY:
37.94%
FNGS:
-48.98%
LLY:
-68.27%
FNGS:
-9.54%
LLY:
-21.46%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's -2.49% return.
FNGS
-3.28%
23.18%
2.82%
26.49%
28.21%
N/A
LLY
-2.49%
3.47%
-5.45%
-2.41%
39.23%
28.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGS vs. LLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FNGS
LLY
FNGS vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNGS vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% | 2.84% |
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and LLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNGS vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) is 15.45%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 22.38%. This indicates that FNGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.