FNGR vs. PHYL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL).

PHYL is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018.

Performance

FNGR vs. PHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNGR vs. PHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNGR FingerMotion Inc	-19.11%	2.50%	-70.15%	43.06%	-60.48%	-29.36%	1,084.12%	-70.69%	-12.12%
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	-0.69%	9.65%	8.45%	11.91%	-11.80%	6.20%	6.31%	16.77%	-4.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGR achieves a -19.11% return, which is significantly lower than PHYL's -0.69% return.

FNGR

• 1D: 6.85%
• 1M: -19.11%
• YTD: -19.11%
• 6M: -37.03%
• 1Y: -27.37%
• 3Y*: -12.79%
• 5Y*: -38.28%
• 10Y*: 7.12%

PHYL

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FNGR vs. PHYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGR

FNGR Risk / Return Rank: 32
FNGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FNGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FNGR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FNGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FNGR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PHYL

PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 85
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGR vs. PHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGR	PHYL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	1.68	-1.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	2.35	-2.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.39	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	1.95	-2.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	9.37	-9.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGR vs. PHYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the PHYL Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGR and PHYL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGR	PHYL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27	1.68	-1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	0.70	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.69	-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between FNGR and PHYL is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FNGR vs. PHYL - Dividend Comparison

FNGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNGR FingerMotion Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	7.88%	7.05%	8.28%	7.62%	6.55%	6.13%	7.51%	7.31%	1.79%

Drawdowns

FNGR vs. PHYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGR drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than PHYL's maximum drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGR and PHYL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGR	PHYL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.86%	-22.07%	-75.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.62%	-3.80%	-75.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.42%	-16.11%	-78.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.78%	-1.76%	-92.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.58%	-3.13%	-59.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.24%	0.79%	+60.45%

Volatility

FNGR vs. PHYL - Volatility Comparison

FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) has a higher volatility of 23.84% compared to PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) at 1.88%. This indicates that FNGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGR	PHYL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.84%	1.88%	+21.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.35%	2.50%	+57.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.92%	4.46%	+96.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.81%	5.66%	+121.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	185.49%	7.73%	+177.76%