FNGR vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNGR (FingerMotion Inc) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. FNGR operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FNGR returned 6.44%/yr vs 68.84%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FNGR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGR achieves a -27.15% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGR has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 6.44%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.84% annualized return.

FNGR

• 1D: 29.48%
• 1M: -9.18%
• YTD: -27.15%
• 6M: -30.00%
• 1Y: -66.32%
• 3Y*: -14.82%
• 5Y*: -34.71%
• 10Y*: 6.44%

NVDA

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 6M: 19.59%
• 1Y: 52.10%
• 3Y*: 76.15%
• 5Y*: 65.05%
• 10Y*: 68.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGR FingerMotion Inc	-27.15%	2.50%	-70.15%	43.06%	-60.48%	-29.36%	1,084.12%	-70.69%	-31.76%	1,150.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	15.15%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGR and NVDA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2015	0.08

The correlation between FNGR and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS FNGR : -$0.09 NVDA : $6.53
PS Ratio FNGR : 1.62 NVDA : 20.72
Total Revenue (TTM) FNGR : $33.14M NVDA : $253.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) FNGR : $1.66M NVDA : $187.95B
EBITDA (TTM) FNGR : -$5.79M NVDA : $192.76B

Return for Risk

FNGR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGR

FNGR Risk / Return Rank: 9
FNGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FNGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FNGR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FNGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FNGR Martin Ratio Rank: 8

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 78
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGR	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	1.53	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.15	2.15	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.26	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	2.59	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	6.36	-7.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGR vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGR and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGR	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70	1.53	-2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	1.27	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	1.39	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.63	-0.51

Drawdowns

FNGR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGR drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGR and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGR	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.86%	-89.72%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.07%	-20.21%	-52.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-91.16%	-36.88%	-54.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.35%	-66.34%	-26.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.86%	-66.34%	-31.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.40%	-8.90%	-85.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.07%	-36.21%	-26.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.00%	8.21%	+40.79%

Volatility

FNGR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) has a higher volatility of 46.97% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that FNGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGR	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.97%	12.53%	+34.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.88%	25.54%	+42.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.13%	34.22%	+60.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.48%	51.69%	+76.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	185.99%	49.80%	+136.19%

Dividends

FNGR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

FNGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGR FingerMotion Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGR and NVDA in my portfolio?

FNGR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGR or NVDA?

FNGR has higher volatility (46.97%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGR dropped -97.86% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.