PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FNGG vs. CBZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGG and CBZ is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

FNGG vs. CBZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
23.86%
-0.33%
FNGG
CBZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNGG:

2.12

CBZ:

1.05

Sortino Ratio

FNGG:

2.50

CBZ:

1.41

Omega Ratio

FNGG:

1.32

CBZ:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

FNGG:

1.50

CBZ:

1.35

Martin Ratio

FNGG:

9.06

CBZ:

3.01

Ulcer Index

FNGG:

11.63%

CBZ:

11.55%

Daily Std Dev

FNGG:

49.64%

CBZ:

33.17%

Max Drawdown

FNGG:

-91.33%

CBZ:

-96.16%

Current Drawdown

FNGG:

-40.63%

CBZ:

-1.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than CBZ's 3.26% return.


FNGG

YTD

2.11%

1M

-0.60%

6M

24.06%

1Y

92.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CBZ

YTD

3.26%

1M

4.00%

6M

-0.78%

1Y

33.18%

5Y*

25.54%

10Y*

25.91%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGG vs. CBZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGG is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGG is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGG is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGG is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGG is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGG is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CBZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CBZ is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CBZ is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CBZ is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CBZ is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CBZ is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CBZ is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGG vs. CBZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNGG, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.121.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNGG, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.501.41
The chart of Omega ratio for FNGG, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.321.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNGG, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.501.35
The chart of Martin ratio for FNGG, currently valued at 9.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.063.01
FNGG
CBZ

The current FNGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the CBZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGG and CBZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.12
1.05
FNGG
CBZ

Dividends

FNGG vs. CBZ - Dividend Comparison

FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while CBZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
0.77%0.79%0.88%0.00%4.99%
CBZ
CBIZ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FNGG vs. CBZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, smaller than the maximum CBZ drawdown of -96.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and CBZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-40.63%
-1.77%
FNGG
CBZ

Volatility

FNGG vs. CBZ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) has a higher volatility of 14.80% compared to CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) at 6.03%. This indicates that FNGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.80%
6.03%
FNGG
CBZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab