FNGD vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Apple Inc. (AAPL).
FNGD is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGD or AAPL.
Key characteristics
| FNGD | AAPL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -40.87% | -4.80% |
| 1Y Return | -78.79% | 5.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -64.20% | 13.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -75.86% | 30.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.13 | 0.30 |
| Daily Std Dev | 70.29% | 20.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.97% | -81.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.97% | -7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and AAPL is -0.73. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
FNGD vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -40.87% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -4.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGD vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Apple Inc. (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNGD vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AAPL Apple Inc. | 0.53% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | 1.67% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNGD vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 23.63% compared to Apple Inc. (AAPL) at 8.23%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.