FNDX vs. MGV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index while MGV tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDX returned 14.48%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for MGV. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.

Performance

FNDX vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has outperformed MGV with an annualized return of 14.48%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.

FNDX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 13.73%
• 1Y: 30.33%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: 14.48%

MGV

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 15.48%
• 1Y: 28.43%
• 3Y*: 19.53%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 13.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.31%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	15.89%	15.45%	16.94%	9.16%	-1.22%	25.93%	2.50%	25.54%	-4.13%	16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and MGV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.95

The correlation between FNDX and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDX vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDX	MGV
Technology	22.1%	18.5%
Financial Services	13.3%	22.8%
Healthcare	11.9%	16.0%
Communication Services	9.9%	3.2%
Energy	9.3%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	3.4%
Industrials	9.1%	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	11.0%
Basic Materials	3.6%	2.3%
Utilities	3.0%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FNDX vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

MGV

MGV Risk / Return Rank: 87
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDX	MGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	2.81	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	3.99	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.50	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.02	4.45	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.42	16.89	+2.53

FNDX vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and MGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDX	MGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-56.07%	+18.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-6.42%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	-13.18%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	-16.54%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.72%	-35.41%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-0.82%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-7.77%	+4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.69%	-0.12%

Volatility

FNDX vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDX	MGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.49%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	7.82%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.47%	10.18%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	13.58%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	16.32%	+1.16%

FNDX vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDX vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than MGV's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	1.84%	2.04%	2.31%	2.48%	2.45%	2.17%	2.47%	2.69%	2.65%	2.34%	2.53%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDX and MGV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FNDX and MGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDX or MGV?

MGV has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FNDX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs MGV's -56.07%.

Which ETF is better, FNDX or MGV?

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.48% vs 13.34% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDX or MGV?

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDX or MGV?

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDX or MGV?

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

What is the main difference between FNDX and MGV?

FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.05% for MGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.