FNDX vs. BKLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC).
FNDX and BKLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. BKLC is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. Both FNDX and BKLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDX or BKLC.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and BKLC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNDX vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNDX:
1.90
BKLC:
2.26
FNDX:
2.63
BKLC:
3.01
FNDX:
1.35
BKLC:
1.41
FNDX:
3.29
BKLC:
3.38
FNDX:
11.53
BKLC:
14.95
FNDX:
1.84%
BKLC:
1.90%
FNDX:
11.22%
BKLC:
12.62%
FNDX:
-37.71%
BKLC:
-26.14%
FNDX:
-5.05%
BKLC:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly lower than BKLC's 26.58% return.
FNDX
19.17%
-2.37%
8.53%
20.12%
16.37%
14.11%
BKLC
26.58%
0.32%
9.85%
27.26%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDX vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDX vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDX vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than BKLC's 1.20% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.76% | 2.66% | 4.03% | 2.37% | 3.34% | 4.27% | 6.16% | 3.94% | 4.97% | 5.22% | 3.20% | 0.46% |
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and BKLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDX vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.58%, while BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.