PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDF vs. VWIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Vanguard International Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly higher than VWIGX's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed VWIGX with an annualized return of 11.87%, while VWIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


FNDF

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.05%
6M
10.61%
YTD
21.52%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
11.87%
ALL TIME*
9.15%

VWIGX

1D
1.20%
1M
0.78%
6M
7.24%
YTD
8.20%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
-1.63%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$80.54M$73.00M$75.40M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
21.52%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%
VWIGX
Vanguard International Growth Fund Investor Shares
8.20%19.96%9.07%14.65%-30.86%-11.18%59.57%31.36%-12.68%42.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and VWIGX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.81

The correlation between FNDF and VWIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDF
VWIGX

Financial Services

20.2%
12.2%

Industrials

12.8%
13.5%

Technology

11.5%
27.5%

Energy

10.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

10.0%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
4.1%

Healthcare

6.0%
11.7%

Utilities

4.3%
0.5%

Communication Services

3.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

FNDF
20.2%
VWIGX
12.2%

Industrials

FNDF
12.8%
VWIGX
13.5%

Technology

FNDF
11.5%
VWIGX
27.5%

Energy

FNDF
10.6%
VWIGX
1.9%

Basic Materials

FNDF
10.0%
VWIGX
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDF
8.2%
VWIGX
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

FNDF
6.2%
VWIGX
4.1%

Healthcare

FNDF
6.0%
VWIGX
11.7%

Utilities

FNDF
4.3%
VWIGX
0.5%

Communication Services

FNDF
3.4%
VWIGX
6.2%

Real Estate

FNDF
0.9%
VWIGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDF vs. VWIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VWIGX
VWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Vanguard International Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDFVWIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.15

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

1.06

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

3.40

+9.78

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the VWIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and VWIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum VWIGX drawdown of -59.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and VWIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDFVWIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-59.58%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-14.06%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-20.04%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-52.69%

+27.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-53.25%

+13.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-11.84%

+11.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-13.80%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.39%

-1.37%

Volatility

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is 4.14%, while Vanguard International Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWIGX) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that FNDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDFVWIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.81%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

15.88%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

19.17%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

23.43%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

21.55%

-4.11%

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VWIGX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDF vs. VWIGX - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than VWIGX's 6.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
3.00%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
VWIGX
Vanguard International Growth Fund Investor Shares
6.23%6.74%9.68%1.82%6.90%2.36%2.28%1.20%5.34%0.84%1.26%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDF and VWIGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWIGX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to FNDF (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs VWIGX's -59.58%.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDF and VWIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer