PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHH's 11.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 11.28%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
-1.61%
1M
3.09%
YTD
15.56%
6M
16.15%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
11.28%

SCHH

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
11.08%
6M
10.11%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
15.56%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
11.08%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and SCHH is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.39

FNDE vs. SCHH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
SCHH

Financial Services

23.8%
0.1%

Technology

18.7%

-

Energy

15.5%

-

Basic Materials

13.6%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Communication Services

6.6%

-

Industrials

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.5%
98.7%

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Financial Services

FNDE
23.8%
SCHH
0.1%

Technology

FNDE
18.7%
SCHH

-

Energy

FNDE
15.5%
SCHH

-

Basic Materials

FNDE
13.6%
SCHH
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
9.5%
SCHH

-

Communication Services

FNDE
6.6%
SCHH

-

Industrials

FNDE
4.7%
SCHH

-

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.1%
SCHH

-

Utilities

FNDE
2.5%
SCHH

-

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
SCHH
98.7%

Healthcare

FNDE
0.5%
SCHH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDESCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.17

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.47

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

4.62

+9.10

FNDE vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDESCHHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

0.92

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.16

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.19

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.34

+0.04

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDESCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-44.22%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-8.28%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-17.76%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-33.28%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-44.22%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-3.19%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-9.45%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.62%

+0.08%

Volatility

FNDE vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) at 3.82%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDESCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.82%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

9.48%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

13.17%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

18.70%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

20.97%

-1.67%

FNDE vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than SCHH's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
3.62%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.82%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and SCHH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SCHH (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.28% vs 4.02% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 2.82% for SCHH.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHH is REIT. FNDE tracks Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.07% for SCHH.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer