PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FND vs. TREX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FND vs. TREX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FND achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than TREX's 23.60% return.


FND

1D
4.10%
1M
-2.49%
6M
-12.72%
YTD
-5.45%
1Y
-26.48%
3Y*
-20.43%
5Y*
-13.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.20%

TREX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-10.54%
6M
4.68%
YTD
23.60%
1Y
-31.63%
3Y*
-17.04%
5Y*
-14.89%
10Y*
11.78%
ALL TIME*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$158.82M$137.16M$147.48M
$90.26M$92.94M$90.53M

FND vs. TREX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FND
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
-5.45%-38.93%-10.63%60.22%-46.44%40.02%82.74%96.18%-46.80%60.93%
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
23.60%-49.18%-16.62%95.58%-68.65%61.29%86.29%51.42%9.53%47.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FND and TREX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017

0.54

The correlation between FND and TREX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FND:

$6.22B

TREX:

$4.51B

EPS

FND:

$2.14

TREX:

$1.80

PE Ratio

FND:

26.87

TREX:

24.09

PS Ratio

FND:

1.32

TREX:

3.91

PB Ratio

FND:

2.49

TREX:

4.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

FND:

$4.71B

TREX:

$1.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FND:

$2.00B

TREX:

$461.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

FND:

$484.65M

TREX:

$308.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FND vs. TREX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FND
FND Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FND Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TREX
TREX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FND vs. TREX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDTREXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.91

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.60

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

-0.92

+0.15

FND vs. TREX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FND Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is comparable to the TREX Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FND and TREX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FND vs. TREX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FND drawdown since its inception was -69.65%, smaller than the maximum TREX drawdown of -90.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FND and TREX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDTREXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.65%

-90.53%

+20.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.90%

-54.23%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.48%

-69.90%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.65%

-78.58%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.83%

-69.18%

+9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.73%

-38.90%

+11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.18%

35.27%

-3.09%

Volatility

FND vs. TREX - Volatility Comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) at 11.21%. This indicates that FND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDTREXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.28%

11.21%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.81%

29.63%

+7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.08%

51.30%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.64%

47.64%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.78%

46.60%

+2.18%

Dividends

FND vs. TREX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FND nor TREX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FND vs. TREX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. and Trex Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FND vs. TREX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. and Trex Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 603.12M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

TREX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trex Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.02M and revenue of 343.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

FND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 123.98M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

TREX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trex Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.51M and revenue of 343.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.

FND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 95.87M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

TREX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trex Company, Inc. reported a net income of 61.40M and revenue of 343.40M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FND and TREX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FND has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to TREX (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FND dropped -69.65% vs TREX's -90.53%.

FND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FND and TREX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer