FND vs. BLDR
Compare and contrast key facts about Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FND or BLDR.
Correlation
The correlation between FND and BLDR is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FND vs. BLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FND:
23.65%
BLDR:
42.66%
FND:
-1.18%
BLDR:
-96.78%
FND:
0.00%
BLDR:
-47.56%
Fundamentals
FND:
$8.11B
BLDR:
$12.24B
FND:
$1.89
BLDR:
$7.79
FND:
39.87
BLDR:
14.21
FND:
2.20
BLDR:
0.81
FND:
1.79
BLDR:
0.76
FND:
3.56
BLDR:
2.68
FND:
$4.52B
BLDR:
$16.17B
FND:
$1.91B
BLDR:
$5.20B
FND:
$497.11M
BLDR:
$1.97B
Returns By Period
FND
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BLDR
-22.54%
-8.42%
-37.92%
-33.68%
46.49%
24.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FND vs. BLDR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FND
BLDR
FND vs. BLDR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FND vs. BLDR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FND nor BLDR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FND vs. BLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FND drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum BLDR drawdown of -96.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FND and BLDR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FND vs. BLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
FND vs. BLDR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. and Builders FirstSource, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FND vs. BLDR - Profitability Comparison
FND - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 508.17M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.
BLDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
FND - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 64.23M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.
BLDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 184.44M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
FND - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 48.88M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
BLDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a net income of 96.30M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.