FNARX vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
FNARX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 1997. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNARX or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between FNARX and SMH is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FNARX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNARX:
0.00
SMH:
1.18
FNARX:
0.12
SMH:
1.69
FNARX:
1.01
SMH:
1.21
FNARX:
0.00
SMH:
1.66
FNARX:
0.01
SMH:
4.10
FNARX:
5.56%
SMH:
10.05%
FNARX:
17.33%
SMH:
34.93%
FNARX:
-72.60%
SMH:
-95.73%
FNARX:
-15.18%
SMH:
-11.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNARX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 42.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FNARX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 4.34%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.76% annualized return.
FNARX
1.70%
-9.39%
-11.10%
1.42%
11.09%
4.34%
SMH
42.05%
4.26%
-4.72%
41.28%
29.85%
27.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNARX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNARX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNARX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNARX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNARX nor SMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund | 0.00% | 1.60% | 2.42% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 0.35% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.89% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
FNARX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNARX drawdown since its inception was -72.60%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNARX and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNARX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) is 4.81%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that FNARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.