PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FN vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FN and SPY is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

FN vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.48%
8.46%
FN
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FN:

0.46

SPY:

2.05

Sortino Ratio

FN:

0.97

SPY:

2.73

Omega Ratio

FN:

1.13

SPY:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

FN:

0.89

SPY:

3.11

Martin Ratio

FN:

1.85

SPY:

13.02

Ulcer Index

FN:

13.43%

SPY:

2.01%

Daily Std Dev

FN:

53.81%

SPY:

12.77%

Max Drawdown

FN:

-70.46%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

FN:

-14.04%

SPY:

-2.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 30.01%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.35% annualized return.


FN

YTD

6.92%

1M

1.44%

6M

-0.96%

1Y

26.01%

5Y*

28.77%

10Y*

30.01%

SPY

YTD

0.95%

1M

-1.76%

6M

7.74%

1Y

26.88%

5Y*

14.01%

10Y*

13.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FN vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FN is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FN is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FN is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FN is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FN is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FN is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FN vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FN, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.462.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for FN, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.972.73
The chart of Omega ratio for FN, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for FN, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.893.11
The chart of Martin ratio for FN, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.8513.02
FN
SPY

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.46
2.05
FN
SPY

Dividends

FN vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FN
Fabrinet
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

FN vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.04%
-2.33%
FN
SPY

Volatility

FN vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.01%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.64%
5.01%
FN
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab