FMS vs. DVA
Compare and contrast key facts about Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) and DaVita Inc. (DVA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FMS or DVA.
Correlation
The correlation between FMS and DVA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FMS vs. DVA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FMS:
1.04
DVA:
0.25
FMS:
1.52
DVA:
0.53
FMS:
1.19
DVA:
1.07
FMS:
0.49
DVA:
0.38
FMS:
4.24
DVA:
0.94
FMS:
7.27%
DVA:
8.40%
FMS:
29.76%
DVA:
31.95%
FMS:
-77.28%
DVA:
-92.91%
FMS:
-52.43%
DVA:
-21.04%
Fundamentals
FMS:
$14.62B
DVA:
$11.32B
FMS:
$1.03
DVA:
$10.73
FMS:
22.96
DVA:
13.05
FMS:
0.84
DVA:
1.92
FMS:
0.76
DVA:
0.88
FMS:
0.84
DVA:
92.49
FMS:
$14.61B
DVA:
$9.74B
FMS:
$3.58B
DVA:
$5.28B
FMS:
$1.86B
DVA:
$2.12B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMS achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than DVA's -6.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FMS has underperformed DVA with an annualized return of -4.17%, while DVA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.37% annualized return.
FMS
4.46%
-4.56%
15.37%
25.53%
-5.64%
-4.17%
DVA
-6.37%
-6.54%
-13.55%
11.04%
12.40%
5.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FMS vs. DVA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FMS
DVA
FMS vs. DVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) and DaVita Inc. (DVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FMS vs. DVA - Dividend Comparison
FMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA | 2.68% | 2.80% | 2.97% | 4.34% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 1.78% | 1.95% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.44% |
DVA DaVita Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FMS vs. DVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMS drawdown since its inception was -77.28%, smaller than the maximum DVA drawdown of -92.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMS and DVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FMS vs. DVA - Volatility Comparison
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) has a higher volatility of 11.87% compared to DaVita Inc. (DVA) at 9.95%. This indicates that FMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FMS vs. DVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA and DaVita Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities