FMS vs. DVA
Compare and contrast key facts about Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) and DaVita Inc. (DVA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FMS or DVA.
Correlation
The correlation between FMS and DVA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FMS vs. DVA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FMS:
0.47
DVA:
1.28
FMS:
0.90
DVA:
1.83
FMS:
1.11
DVA:
1.25
FMS:
0.23
DVA:
1.67
FMS:
1.84
DVA:
8.41
FMS:
8.05%
DVA:
4.43%
FMS:
31.50%
DVA:
29.13%
FMS:
-77.28%
DVA:
-92.91%
FMS:
-53.66%
DVA:
-12.62%
Fundamentals
FMS:
$13.97B
DVA:
$12.10B
FMS:
$1.18
DVA:
$9.28
FMS:
20.18
DVA:
15.90
FMS:
0.49
DVA:
1.11
FMS:
$19.24B
DVA:
$12.67B
FMS:
$4.84B
DVA:
$3.78B
FMS:
$3.19B
DVA:
$2.60B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMS achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than DVA's 40.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FMS has underperformed DVA with an annualized return of -2.93%, while DVA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.82% annualized return.
FMS
13.83%
4.16%
17.25%
14.94%
-6.38%
-2.93%
DVA
40.09%
-6.77%
3.20%
37.89%
14.82%
6.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FMS vs. DVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) and DaVita Inc. (DVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FMS vs. DVA - Dividend Comparison
FMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA | 2.75% | 2.97% | 4.34% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 1.78% | 1.95% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.44% | 1.38% |
DVA DaVita Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FMS vs. DVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMS drawdown since its inception was -77.28%, smaller than the maximum DVA drawdown of -92.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMS and DVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FMS vs. DVA - Volatility Comparison
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to DaVita Inc. (DVA) at 6.07%. This indicates that FMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FMS vs. DVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA and DaVita Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities