PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FMET vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FMET and VGT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FMET vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.65%
13.26%
FMET
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FMET:

0.54

VGT:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

FMET:

0.87

VGT:

1.60

Omega Ratio

FMET:

1.11

VGT:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

FMET:

0.70

VGT:

1.70

Martin Ratio

FMET:

1.93

VGT:

5.91

Ulcer Index

FMET:

5.54%

VGT:

4.39%

Daily Std Dev

FMET:

19.64%

VGT:

22.33%

Max Drawdown

FMET:

-29.22%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

FMET:

0.00%

VGT:

-0.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMET achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 3.52% return.


FMET

YTD

9.56%

1M

8.00%

6M

9.72%

1Y

15.61%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

3.52%

1M

2.58%

6M

10.89%

1Y

28.80%

5Y*

20.51%

10Y*

20.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMET vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMET has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.


FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
Expense ratio chart for FMET: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for VGT: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMET vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMET is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMET is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMET is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMET is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMET is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMET is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMET vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FMET, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.541.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for FMET, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.871.60
The chart of Omega ratio for FMET, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.111.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for FMET, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.701.70
The chart of Martin ratio for FMET, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.935.91
FMET
VGT

The current FMET Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMET and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.54
1.16
FMET
VGT

Dividends

FMET vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than VGT's 0.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
0.40%0.44%0.40%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.58%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

FMET vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMET drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMET and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-0.55%
FMET
VGT

Volatility

FMET vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is 4.79%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that FMET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.79%
7.66%
FMET
VGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab