FMET vs. FSELX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FMET (Fidelity Metaverse ETF) and FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) are both funds - FMET is a Communications Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSELX is a Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FMET returned 11.40%/yr vs 50.94%/yr for FSELX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FMET charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FSELX.

Performance

FMET vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMET achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 48.22% return.

FMET

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 4.91%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.30%

FSELX

• 1D: 7.17%
• 1M: -8.92%
• 6M: 32.88%
• YTD: 48.22%
• 1Y: 83.24%
• 3Y*: 50.94%
• 5Y*: 38.34%
• 10Y*: 35.08%
• ALL TIME*: 16.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMET Fidelity Metaverse ETF	$106.31K	$94.10K	$143.93K
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FMET vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMET Fidelity Metaverse ETF	3.07%	21.93%	6.76%	39.18%	-18.57%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	48.22%	52.17%	49.68%	78.49%	-16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FMET and FSELX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2022	0.79

The correlation between FMET and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMET vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMET

FMET Risk / Return Rank: 16
FMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FMET Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FMET Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FSELX

FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMET vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMET	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	1.91	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	2.35	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.31	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	2.90	-2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.62	12.21	-11.59

FMET vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMET Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMET and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMET vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMET drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMET and FSELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMET	FSELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.94%	-82.54%	+52.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.00%	-26.87%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	-36.31%	+11.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	-21.63%	+14.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	-28.63%	+20.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.17%	6.37%	+2.80%

Volatility

FMET vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is 4.88%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 16.75%. This indicates that FMET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMET	FSELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	16.75%	-11.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.48%	34.43%	-16.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.32%	40.79%	-19.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.30%	40.42%	-16.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.30%	35.84%	-11.54%

FMET vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMET has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMET vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

FMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FSELX's 11.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMET Fidelity Metaverse ETF	0.51%	0.81%	0.44%	0.40%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	11.05%	11.11%	7.97%	7.20%	6.69%	6.99%	8.13%	3.36%	26.80%	14.44%	3.82%	15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMET and FSELX in my portfolio?

FMET and FSELX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMET or FSELX?

FSELX has higher volatility (16.75%) compared to FMET (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMET dropped -29.94% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.