FMDE vs. FTQGX
FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both funds - FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FTQGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, FMDE returned 21.18% vs 52.41% for FTQGX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTQGX.
Performance
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 26.73% return.
FMDE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQGX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 26.73%
- 6M
- 25.48%
- 1Y
- 52.41%
- 3Y*
- 30.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 19.11%
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 10.64% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund | 26.73% | 13.65% | 36.95% | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDE and FTQGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FMDE and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMDE vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank
FMDE
FTQGX
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMDE | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.17 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 17.96 | -7.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMDE | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.68 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.51 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and FTQGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDE | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.10% | -61.29% | +40.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -12.76% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -14.19% | +11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.96% | -0.86% |
Volatility
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) is 3.16%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that FMDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMDE | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 7.11% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 15.39% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 19.91% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 21.66% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 21.56% | -5.44% |
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMDE vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison
FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FTQGX's 9.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund | 9.82% | 12.44% | 9.94% | 0.61% | 7.96% | 13.53% | 11.41% | 5.07% | 14.71% | 5.89% | 1.08% | 5.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMDE and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTQGX has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to FMDE (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDE dropped -21.10% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.
FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMDE and FTQGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer