FMC vs. GPN

In the year-to-date period, FMC achieves a -14.10% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -35.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FMC has underperformed GPN with an annualized return of -0.28%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMC Corporation (FMC) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the GPN Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMC and GPN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than GPN's 1.38% yield.

The maximum FMC drawdown since its inception was -73.16%, which is greater than GPN's maximum drawdown of -68.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMC and GPN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for FMC Corporation (FMC) is 18.21%, while Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a volatility of 28.09%. This indicates that FMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FMC Corporation and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.