FMC vs. CTRA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FMC (FMC Corporation) and CTRA (Coterra Energy Inc.) are both stocks. FMC operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while CTRA operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, FMC returned -7.59%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for CTRA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FMC vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMC Corporation (FMC) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMC achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than CTRA's 24.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FMC has underperformed CTRA with an annualized return of -7.59%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.42% annualized return.

FMC

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -11.40%
• YTD: -4.88%
• 6M: -3.15%
• 1Y: -65.70%
• 3Y*: -48.30%
• 5Y*: -33.47%
• 10Y*: -7.59%

CTRA

• 1D: -8.62%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: 24.61%
• 6M: 24.28%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 12.65%
• 5Y*: 19.04%
• 10Y*: 6.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMC vs. CTRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMC FMC Corporation	-4.88%	-69.98%	-19.72%	-48.02%	15.70%	-2.59%	17.32%	84.70%	-20.97%	68.80%
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc.	24.61%	6.68%	3.38%	8.72%	39.15%	23.50%	-4.33%	-20.78%	-21.07%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FMC and CTRA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 1990	0.30

The correlation between FMC and CTRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FMC : $1.65B CTRA : $24.84B
EPS FMC : -$19.99 CTRA : $2.19
PS Ratio FMC : 0.48 CTRA : 3.83
Total Revenue (TTM) FMC : $3.43B CTRA : $6.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) FMC : $1.21B CTRA : $2.63B
EBITDA (TTM) FMC : -$395.10M CTRA : $4.83B

Return for Risk

FMC vs. CTRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMC

FMC Risk / Return Rank: 6
FMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FMC Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CTRA

CTRA Risk / Return Rank: 77
CTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMC vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMC Corporation (FMC) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMC	CTRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	1.61	-2.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	2.08	-3.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.27	-0.49
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	2.14	-3.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	4.51	-5.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMC vs. CTRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the CTRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMC and CTRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMC	CTRA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.96	1.61	-2.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.71	0.56	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.19	0.18	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.27	-0.24

Drawdowns

FMC vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMC drawdown since its inception was -90.07%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMC and CTRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMC	CTRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.07%	-74.41%	-15.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.12%	-15.51%	-56.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.81%	-23.62%	-64.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.07%	-33.25%	-56.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.07%	-52.56%	-37.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.19%	-10.33%	-78.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.56%	-26.96%	-9.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.06%	7.38%	+44.68%

Volatility

FMC vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison

FMC Corporation (FMC) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) at 13.41%. This indicates that FMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMC	CTRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.53%	13.41%	+2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.19%	23.40%	+19.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.54%	30.69%	+37.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.02%	34.49%	+12.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.08%	35.56%	+5.52%

Dividends

FMC vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison

FMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than CTRA's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc.	2.03%	3.34%	3.29%	4.58%	8.47%	5.89%	2.46%	2.01%	1.12%	0.59%	0.34%	0.45%
FMC FMC Corporation	10.05%	13.12%	4.77%	3.68%	1.74%	1.79%	1.57%	12.47%	1.21%	0.70%	1.17%	1.69%

Financials

FMC vs. CTRA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FMC Corporation and Coterra Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.60M and revenue of 758.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

CTRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 876.00M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.

FMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported an operating income of 3.40M and revenue of 758.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

CTRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 646.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.5%.

FMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported a net income of -281.30M and revenue of 758.60M, resulting in a net margin of -37.1%.

CTRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a net income of 466.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 40.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMC and CTRA in my portfolio?

FMC and CTRA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMC or CTRA?

FMC has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to CTRA (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMC dropped -90.07% vs CTRA's -74.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.