PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMC vs. BG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FMC vs. BG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMC Corporation (FMC) and Bunge Limited (BG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMC achieves a -20.10% return, which is significantly lower than BG's 26.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FMC has underperformed BG with an annualized return of -8.47%, while BG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.


FMC

1D
-4.50%
1M
-15.87%
YTD
-20.10%
6M
-15.43%
1Y
-72.00%
3Y*
-51.01%
5Y*
-35.34%
10Y*
-8.47%

BG

1D
-1.03%
1M
-7.70%
YTD
26.55%
6M
25.55%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMC vs. BG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMC
FMC Corporation
-20.10%-69.98%-19.72%-48.02%15.70%-2.59%17.32%84.70%-20.97%68.80%
BG
Bunge Limited
26.55%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FMC and BG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FMC:

$1.38B

BG:

$21.84B

EPS

FMC:

-$19.99

BG:

$4.12

PS Ratio

FMC:

0.40

BG:

0.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

FMC:

$3.43B

BG:

$80.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FMC:

$1.21B

BG:

$3.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

FMC:

-$395.10M

BG:

$2.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMC vs. BG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMC
FMC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMC vs. BG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMC Corporation (FMC) and Bunge Limited (BG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMCBGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.21

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

2.26

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

6.49

-7.81

FMC vs. BG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMC Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the BG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMC and BG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMC vs. BG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMC drawdown since its inception was -91.11%, which is greater than BG's maximum drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMC and BG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCBGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.11%

-77.34%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.01%

-15.21%

-59.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.59%

-38.82%

-49.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.11%

-41.49%

-49.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.11%

-60.49%

-30.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.92%

-15.21%

-75.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.63%

-28.86%

-7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.65%

5.55%

+49.10%

Volatility

FMC vs. BG - Volatility Comparison

FMC Corporation (FMC) has a higher volatility of 16.38% compared to Bunge Limited (BG) at 9.82%. This indicates that FMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCBGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.38%

9.82%

+6.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.84%

20.53%

+24.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.70%

31.05%

+38.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.44%

29.29%

+18.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.34%

31.06%

+10.28%

Dividends

FMC vs. BG - Dividend Comparison

FMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, more than BG's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BG
Bunge Limited
2.53%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%
FMC
FMC Corporation
11.97%13.12%4.77%3.68%1.74%1.79%1.57%12.47%1.21%0.70%1.17%1.69%

Financials

FMC vs. BG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FMC Corporation and Bunge Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
758.60M
21.86B
(FMC) Total Revenue
(BG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FMC vs. BG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FMC Corporation and Bunge Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
32.5%
3.5%
Portfolio components
FMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.60M and revenue of 758.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

BG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 766.00M and revenue of 21.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

FMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported an operating income of 3.40M and revenue of 758.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

BG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 235.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

FMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported a net income of -281.30M and revenue of 758.60M, resulting in a net margin of -37.1%.

BG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 68.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMC and BG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMC has higher volatility (16.38%) compared to BG (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMC dropped -91.11% vs BG's -77.34%.

BG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMC and BG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer