PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAGX vs. FDSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAGX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than FDSVX's 14.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FMAGX has underperformed FDSVX with an annualized return of 15.20%, while FDSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.


FMAGX

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.67%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.72%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
22.86%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.20%

FDSVX

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.61%
YTD
14.32%
6M
13.45%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
19.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMAGX
Fidelity Magellan Fund
8.11%16.27%28.06%31.04%-27.18%27.08%28.34%31.26%-5.70%26.49%
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
14.32%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-0.33%34.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAGX and FDSVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1998

0.94

The correlation between FMAGX and FDSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMAGX vs. FDSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAGX
FMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAGXFDSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.40

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

9.15

-6.01

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FDSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAGX and FDSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAGXFDSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.84

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.72

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.93

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Drawdowns

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAGX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than FDSVX's maximum drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAGX and FDSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAGXFDSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.14%

-59.34%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.00%

-12.53%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-23.42%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.13%

-29.83%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

-31.09%

-2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.98%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-12.60%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

3.28%

+0.64%

Volatility

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX) is 4.01%, while Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that FMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMAGXFDSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.38%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

12.74%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

16.36%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

20.36%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

20.59%

-0.44%

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAGX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSVX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMAGX vs. FDSVX - Dividend Comparison

FMAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than FDSVX's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.38%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%
FMAGX
Fidelity Magellan Fund
6.37%13.90%6.12%11.72%5.02%7.01%0.30%14.93%10.83%9.64%2.92%7.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FMAGX and FDSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDSVX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FMAGX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAGX dropped -71.14% vs FDSVX's -59.34%.

FDSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMAGX and FDSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer