PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAG vs. XLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMAG vs. XLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMAG vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMAG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
-6.53%10.40%28.52%31.25%-26.92%25.37%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-5.20%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%10.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAG achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLC's -5.20% return.


FMAG

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
-6.53%
6M
-9.35%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*

XLC

1D
0.34%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
-5.20%
6M
-4.07%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMAG vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMAG vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAG
FMAG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAG vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAGXLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

1.43

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.51

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.43

5.11

-2.68

FMAG vs. XLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the XLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAG and XLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAGXLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between FMAG and XLC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FMAG vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison

FMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than XLC's 1.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FMAG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
0.09%0.09%0.15%0.34%0.23%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.26%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%

Drawdowns

FMAG vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAG drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAG and XLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.93%

-46.65%

+13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.97%

-11.07%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.93%

-46.65%

+13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-7.07%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-10.76%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.28%

+0.75%

Volatility

FMAG vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 5.15%. This indicates that FMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMAGXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

5.15%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

9.77%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

18.29%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

20.76%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

22.36%

-2.54%