FM vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
FM and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Frontier Markets 100 Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2012. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both FM and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FM or VT.
Correlation
The correlation between FM and VT is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FM vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FM:
1.30
VT:
1.65
FM:
1.81
VT:
2.25
FM:
1.27
VT:
1.30
FM:
0.42
VT:
2.41
FM:
4.66
VT:
10.48
FM:
2.17%
VT:
1.87%
FM:
7.75%
VT:
11.85%
FM:
-41.63%
VT:
-50.27%
FM:
-17.01%
VT:
-3.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FM achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 17.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FM has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 1.60%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.
FM
7.33%
-0.32%
0.84%
9.20%
0.90%
1.60%
VT
17.12%
-0.90%
6.21%
17.87%
10.16%
9.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FM vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FM vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FM vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
FM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than VT's 1.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF | 3.95% | 3.62% | 2.70% | 2.04% | 2.91% | 3.13% | 4.29% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.76% | 12.35% | 1.11% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.94% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
FM vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FM drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FM vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) is 0.97%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that FM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.