FM vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
FM and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Frontier Markets 100 Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2012. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both FM and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FM or MCHI.
Correlation
The correlation between FM and MCHI is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
FM vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
FM
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MCHI
6.70%
-11.50%
-10.60%
28.11%
-1.15%
-0.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FM vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FM vs. MCHI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FM
MCHI
FM vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FM vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
FM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF | 3.95% | 3.95% | 3.62% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 2.91% | 1.99% | 3.94% | 0.87% | 4.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.26% | 2.31% | 3.49% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
FM vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
FM vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 13.89%. This indicates that FM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with FM or MCHI
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca
Drawdowns and Data
Hi what data sources do you guys use for different ETF, and Mutual Data? Also are drawdowns calculated daily or monthly?
Thank You
Bee Zee