PortfoliosLab logo
FLXR vs. VRIG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLXR and VRIG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLXR vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.63%
4.56%
FLXR
VRIG

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FLXR:

3.33%

VRIG:

1.03%

Max Drawdown

FLXR:

-1.94%

VRIG:

-13.04%

Current Drawdown

FLXR:

-0.31%

VRIG:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXR achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 1.36% return.


FLXR

YTD

2.73%

1M

0.69%

6M

3.01%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VRIG

YTD

1.36%

1M

0.51%

6M

2.25%

1Y

5.33%

5Y*

4.58%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLXR vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLXR vs. VRIG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXR

VRIG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VRIG is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VRIG is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VRIG is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VRIG is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VRIG is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VRIG is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLXR vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FLXR vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison

FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than VRIG's 5.65% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.48%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
5.65%6.09%5.97%2.39%0.78%1.57%3.12%2.89%2.31%0.60%

Drawdowns

FLXR vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXR drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum VRIG drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXR and VRIG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.31%
0
FLXR
VRIG

Volatility

FLXR vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison

TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.37%. This indicates that FLXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.92%
0.37%
FLXR
VRIG