PortfoliosLab logo
FLXR vs. UCON
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLXR and UCON is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLXR vs. UCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.63%
4.89%
FLXR
UCON

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FLXR:

3.34%

UCON:

2.81%

Max Drawdown

FLXR:

-1.94%

UCON:

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

FLXR:

-0.31%

UCON:

-0.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXR achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than UCON's 1.64% return.


FLXR

YTD

2.73%

1M

0.98%

6M

2.93%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

UCON

YTD

1.64%

1M

0.65%

6M

1.96%

1Y

6.14%

5Y*

3.69%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLXR vs. UCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UCON's 0.76% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLXR vs. UCON — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXR

UCON
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UCON is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UCON is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UCON is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UCON is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UCON is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UCON is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLXR vs. UCON - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FLXR vs. UCON - Dividend Comparison

FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than UCON's 4.78% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.48%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
4.78%4.95%4.75%3.12%2.20%3.14%3.50%1.76%

Drawdowns

FLXR vs. UCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXR drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum UCON drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXR and UCON. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.31%
-0.36%
FLXR
UCON

Volatility

FLXR vs. UCON - Volatility Comparison

TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) at 0.83%. This indicates that FLXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.95%
0.83%
FLXR
UCON