PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLWS vs. XMMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLWS and XMMO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

FLWS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.85%
861.88%
FLWS
XMMO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLWS:

-0.49

XMMO:

2.31

Sortino Ratio

FLWS:

-0.46

XMMO:

3.16

Omega Ratio

FLWS:

0.94

XMMO:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

FLWS:

-0.26

XMMO:

4.97

Martin Ratio

FLWS:

-1.01

XMMO:

12.46

Ulcer Index

FLWS:

20.79%

XMMO:

3.71%

Daily Std Dev

FLWS:

43.07%

XMMO:

20.03%

Max Drawdown

FLWS:

-95.71%

XMMO:

-55.37%

Current Drawdown

FLWS:

-78.56%

XMMO:

-4.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLWS achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FLWS has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 1.22%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.


FLWS

YTD

-0.37%

1M

13.53%

6M

-14.76%

1Y

-23.57%

5Y*

-11.62%

10Y*

1.22%

XMMO

YTD

4.99%

1M

4.79%

6M

12.49%

1Y

44.86%

5Y*

16.34%

10Y*

16.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLWS vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLWS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLWS is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLWS is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLWS is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLWS is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLWS is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLWS is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMMO is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMMO is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLWS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLWS, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.492.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLWS, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.463.16
The chart of Omega ratio for FLWS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.941.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLWS, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.264.97
The chart of Martin ratio for FLWS, currently valued at -1.01, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-1.0112.46
FLWS
XMMO

The current FLWS Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLWS and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.49
2.31
FLWS
XMMO

Dividends

FLWS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FLWS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.32%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%1.24%

Drawdowns

FLWS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLWS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLWS and XMMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-78.56%
-4.74%
FLWS
XMMO

Volatility

FLWS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) has a higher volatility of 17.43% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 6.21%. This indicates that FLWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
17.43%
6.21%
FLWS
XMMO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab