FLWS vs. XMMO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FLWS (1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.) is a stock, while XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, FLWS returned -8.11%/yr vs 18.04%/yr for XMMO. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

FLWS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLWS achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FLWS has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of -8.11%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.

FLWS

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 1.30%
• 6M: -9.72%
• YTD: -0.76%
• 1Y: -27.51%
• 3Y*: -22.99%
• 5Y*: -33.72%
• 10Y*: -8.11%
• ALL TIME*: -6.17%

XMMO

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -5.42%
• 6M: 10.34%
• YTD: 11.79%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 23.81%
• 5Y*: 13.41%
• 10Y*: 18.04%
• ALL TIME*: 12.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLWS 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.	$1.08M	$914.50K	$2.09M
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	$60.32M	$71.93M	$66.65M

FLWS vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLWS 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.	-0.76%	-51.90%	-24.21%	12.76%	-59.09%	-10.12%	79.31%	18.56%	14.30%	0.00%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	11.79%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLWS and XMMO is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between FLWS and XMMO has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FLWS vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLWS

FLWS Risk / Return Rank: 24
FLWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FLWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FLWS Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FLWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FLWS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 39
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLWS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLWS	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	0.89	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	1.35	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.17	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	1.38	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	5.81	-6.85

FLWS vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLWS Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLWS and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLWS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLWS drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLWS and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLWS	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.91%	-55.37%	-40.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.58%	-13.91%	-35.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.43%	-24.93%	-48.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.49%	-27.91%	-63.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.10%	-36.74%	-55.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.73%	-11.24%	-78.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.33%	-9.42%	-53.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.95%	3.29%	+29.66%

Volatility

FLWS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) has a higher volatility of 12.62% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.88%. This indicates that FLWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLWS	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.62%	7.88%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.12%	18.46%	+29.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.54%	21.50%	+57.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.69%	21.86%	+42.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.76%	22.43%	+35.33%

Dividends

FLWS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FLWS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLWS 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.63%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLWS and XMMO in my portfolio?

FLWS and XMMO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLWS or XMMO?

FLWS has higher volatility (12.62%) compared to XMMO (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLWS dropped -95.91% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.