FLVCX vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLVCX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both funds - FLVCX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, FLVCX returned 15.46%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLVCX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLVCX having a 22.74% return and XMMO slightly higher at 23.73%. Over the past 10 years, FLVCX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 15.46%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.

FLVCX

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 22.74%
• 6M: 22.44%
• 1Y: 43.21%
• 3Y*: 29.38%
• 5Y*: 14.72%
• 10Y*: 15.46%

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund	22.74%	20.34%	26.95%	26.10%	-22.99%	26.08%	26.74%	35.60%	-16.43%	20.92%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLVCX and XMMO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005	0.86

The correlation between FLVCX and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLVCX vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLVCX

FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLVCX	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.99	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.77	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	4.45	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.91	18.21	-5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLVCX and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLVCX	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	1.99	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.78	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.89	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.58	-0.03

Drawdowns

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLVCX drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLVCX and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLVCX	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.02%	-55.37%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-8.34%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.54%	-24.93%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.54%	-27.91%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.14%	-36.74%	-7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.00%	-9.45%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	2.04%	+1.49%

Volatility

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) is 6.16%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that FLVCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLVCX	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	7.82%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.59%	15.54%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	18.71%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.78%	21.45%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.38%	22.27%	+1.11%

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLVCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FLVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund	3.85%	4.72%	14.53%	12.19%	18.49%	8.40%	0.11%	0.10%	19.91%	18.96%	27.48%	6.18%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLVCX and XMMO in my portfolio?

FLVCX and XMMO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLVCX or XMMO?

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to FLVCX (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLVCX dropped -70.02% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.