PortfoliosLab logo
FLVCX vs. XMMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLVCX and XMMO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLVCX:

0.36

XMMO:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

FLVCX:

0.62

XMMO:

0.66

Omega Ratio

FLVCX:

1.09

XMMO:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

FLVCX:

0.32

XMMO:

0.35

Martin Ratio

FLVCX:

0.99

XMMO:

1.02

Ulcer Index

FLVCX:

9.28%

XMMO:

8.56%

Daily Std Dev

FLVCX:

29.82%

XMMO:

24.56%

Max Drawdown

FLVCX:

-70.03%

XMMO:

-55.37%

Current Drawdown

FLVCX:

-8.23%

XMMO:

-8.46%

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FLVCX at 0.89% and XMMO at 0.89%. Over the past 10 years, FLVCX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 9.91%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.


FLVCX

YTD

0.89%

1M

11.40%

6M

-4.75%

1Y

10.52%

3Y*

13.47%

5Y*

17.47%

10Y*

9.91%

XMMO

YTD

0.89%

1M

7.78%

6M

-7.80%

1Y

9.54%

3Y*

16.34%

5Y*

16.69%

10Y*

15.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLVCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLVCX vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLVCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLVCX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLVCX is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLVCX is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLVCX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLVCX is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLVCX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMMO is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLVCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLVCX and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FLVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.41%, more than XMMO's 0.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
14.41%14.53%12.19%18.49%8.40%0.11%0.10%19.91%19.08%27.48%7.18%0.76%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.49%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%1.24%

Drawdowns

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLVCX drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLVCX and XMMO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLVCX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 5.25%. This indicates that FLVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...