FLV vs. UL
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while UL (Unilever PLC) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FLV returned 9.70%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for UL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLV vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -5.36% return.
FLV
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
UL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- -8.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
FLV vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 10.18% | 15.80% | 11.51% | 6.23% | 0.94% | 17.30% | 43.00% |
UL Unilever PLC | -5.36% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 25.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and UL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
UL
FLV vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.95 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | -0.33 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | -0.64 | +8.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLV vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -53.55% | +38.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -25.09% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -25.09% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -25.66% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -17.02% | +16.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -10.62% | +7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 13.06% | -10.65% |
Volatility
FLV vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 3.24%, while Unilever PLC (UL) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 6.66% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 17.22% | -9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 22.09% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 21.02% | -8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 21.52% | -7.28% |
Dividends
FLV vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than UL's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.75% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and UL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UL has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to FLV (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs UL's -53.55%.
FLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLV and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer