FLV vs. UL
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while UL (Unilever PLC) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FLV returned 10.66%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for UL. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLV vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -0.32% return.
FLV
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.97%
UL
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- -2.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $466.37K | $491.80K | $1.09M | |
| $424.65M | $320.35M | $265.26M |
FLV vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 16.26% | 15.80% | 11.51% | 6.23% | 0.94% | 17.30% | 43.00% |
UL Unilever PLC | -0.32% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 25.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and UL is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
UL
FLV vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.01 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | -0.09 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | -0.16 | +10.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLV vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -53.55% | +38.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -25.09% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -25.09% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -25.09% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.60% | +12.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -10.63% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 13.52% | -11.16% |
Volatility
FLV vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 3.67%, while Unilever PLC (UL) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 11.06% | -7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.94% | 19.66% | -11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 24.06% | -13.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 21.32% | -8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 21.76% | -7.53% |
Dividends
FLV vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than UL's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.48% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.56% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and UL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UL has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to FLV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs UL's -53.55%.
FLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLV and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer