FLTR vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
FLTR and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both FLTR and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLTR or SCHD.
Performance
FLTR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 2.73%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
FLTR
6.65%
0.61%
3.03%
7.59%
3.40%
2.73%
SCHD
17.35%
2.29%
13.68%
26.18%
12.87%
11.54%
Key characteristics
| FLTR | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.44 | 2.40 |
| Sortino Ratio | 12.21 | 3.44 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.83 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 10.25 | 3.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 114.60 | 12.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.07% | 2.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.02% | 11.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.84% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.62% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and SCHD is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLTR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLTR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than SCHD's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 6.10% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.37% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLTR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.26%, while Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.